I am not a professional food critic. This is a personal blog, and every write-up reflects how I personally understand, taste, and feel a meal. Predicting whether you will agree with my taste is as precise as forecasting the stock market. I share my background, likes, and dislikes so you can gauge how closely your palate aligns with mine and decide if my recommendations will work for you.

In order to give each restaurant a fair evaluation, I try to keep a routine and follow a flexible protocol: I arrive with a neutral appetite, find a "meal of the house" (or something that fits best if none), taste individual ingredients separately before taking a combined bite, and judge dishes as the kitchen intended without adding extra condiments. This allows me to evaluate core cooking quality and give every restaurant an equal playing field.

You can read more on the protocol here.

Yes, I do! When I go back to a place, I write a new review, then update and aggregate my previous reviews so you always get the most current picture.

I usually revisit a spot if the menu has changed dramatically or if they offer a wide variety of dishes I am eager to try. When I accumulate enough visits and data points for a single restaurant, I will write an updated, comprehensive review that synthesizes all my previous experiences into one definitive guide.

My reviews go far beyond just what is on the plate. I look at the whole experience, incorporating atmospheric comfort, service, physical pacing, and overall value into every evaluation.

You will not find ultra-expensive, fine-dining gastronomy posts here. I prefer satisfying, well-executed meals... there is simply not enough: food on those tiny plates for me; money in my wallet.

I aim for clear, descriptive, and honest language, so I don't use much in terms of technical culinary buzzwords. At the end of the day, I am not a trained chef or even someone who works in the hospitality industry; I am just a person who truly loves good food.